|| Author: Duncan Riley|

Agreement Structure

Basically, a typical commercial contract is structured as follows: conditions precedent are conditions that must be met before the contract comes into force. They are generally considered to be outside the main contractual conditions. Two organizations can sign a memorandum of understanding to cooperate on a program. One of them, on the basis of their agreement, grants grants to set up the programme, and then the other – without whose participation the programme cannot be implemented – resigns. The first organization may then be asked to repay the grant money because it was spent on a program that never took place. In this case, although there was no contract or exchange in the original agreement, the second organization could be legally obliged to reimburse the first organization. Or not. It would depend on the circumstances and the judge`s opinion – which is why it is a grey area. The biggest difference between a treaty and a memorandum of understanding is that a treaty is a legal document and can be brought to justice, whereas a memorandum of understanding is neither. We will look at everyone one after the other and look at the places where the differences between them fade. While these definitions seem reasonably clear, there are a number of situations where the picture becomes blurred. For example, when a memorandum of understanding involves an exchange for a sum of money, it is almost always considered a contract under the law.

In addition, there are two other legal conditions under which a memorandum of understanding or no formal agreement can be treated as a treaty. If you work with other groups, hire consultants, or hire organizations to provide services to you or your target audience, you`ll often find it helpful to “receive it in writing.” This section helps you read, understand and design contracts and memoranda of understanding, the two types of documents that most organizations need in their dealings with others. ToolBox recommends that you approach creation in the same way as designing a contract. This reduces misunderstandings or unintentional violations of the agreement and gives everyone the feeling of being sure that they have not promised anything that has done no harm or expectations to their organization, which they previously ignored. . . .

Comments are closed